Prof. Paulo Jorge dos Santos.Jorn., Grafólogo,Prof. e Ambientalista, Pós Graduado em Adm.Legisl.P.UNISUL, Membro do Col. Est. e Nac.de meio Ambiente do PT, F. Mineiro de Agenda 21, Membro da Coord.Est.de Comb.ao Racismo do PTMG, Coord. Reg. Met.de Comb.ao Racismo da RMBH do PTMG. Membro dos Comitês de Bacias dos Rios Pará e São Francisco. Palestrante Em Faculdades e Órgãos Públicos Com Ações e Consultorias Em Dir. Humanos Étnicos e Ambientais.
segunda-feira, março 03, 2014
For Ricardo Melo , STF should redo trial to regain her respectability
Mon, 03/03/2014 - 09:33 Proposed by John Savoie Folha Start againAdmission by the Chief Justice that feathers were raised artificially increases irregularitiesRicardo MeloIf the Supreme Court intends to regain its respectability , there is only one way out : redo , from beginning to end , the trial of the so called PT monthly allowance . The admission by the chief justice , that feathers were artificially increased to the detriment of the defendants broke the camel irregularities of Criminal Case 470 .Recalling some : the obligation of privileged forum for defendants with the right to scroll through multiple instances of Justice , the adoption of the principle that everyone is guilty until proven otherwise , the core of the theory of " field of apparel " ; slicing sentences as conveniences of Rapporteur . And perhaps the most amazing of illegalities , the deliberate concealment of investigations .Legal blemish has a name and number: 2474 survey , conducted in parallel with the investigation that led to the AP 470 .Not any document . Through the 78 volumes of the survey in 2474 , packed with official reports and based on Federal Police investigations , defendants could rebut clinchers his conviction .The refusal of access to the investigation was justified as follows : " practical reasons demonstrate that maintenance, in this case, the investigations concerning the continuity of investigations [ ... ] in relation to facts not contained in the complaint offered , can confusion and harm to the regular progress of the investigations . " The author of the Order , October 2006 , himself , Joaquim Barbosa was .Imagine the situation : the subject is accused of murder , the defendant's trial begins , and during the proceedings of the court, even before any decision of the jury , the alleged victim appears Vivinha silva . " Ah , but other research states that he was dead," the prosecutor argued . " This will create confusion." The trial continues . Living breathes , but the cars are dead . And the defendant , who did not kill anyone , is convicted of murder .The parallel seems absurd , but absurdity is what made the STF . The existence of the investigation in 2474 became public in 2012 , in a report of this leaf on the case of an executive of the Bank of Brazil , Claudio de Castro Vasconcelos .The connection to the AP 470 was evident , because it focused VisaNet sprinkler appointed as the monthly allowance . The process had been open six years earlier , in 2006 , so in time more than apt to be examined.None of these facts is itself new. They resurfaced in January this year , when the minister Ricardo Lewandovski released the paperwork to lawyers Henrique Pizzolato . Strangely , or conveniently , it went almost unnoticed .It's time to turn on the light . The behavior at the same tawdry and unseemly time chief justice tends to focus attention on the outcome of AP 470 . At this time , for various reasons , can be comfortable playing in the back of the burden Joaquim Barbosa , or bonus, the trial . It is clear that their role is indelible , but he is right to remember that the key was decided in plenary.In the end , there convicted and imprisoned in a process that has challenged us all to be . The country remains without really knowing if there was and if there was , what was really called monthly allowance .Conform, or not , with the verdict of the absence of conspiracy is very little on the legal eccentricities , to say the least , that surrounded the trial and have guided the execution of sentences .Although justified awaken curiosity , what matters least is the future of Barbosa . Who is in the spotlight is the Supreme Court as a whole: matter whether the country has a credible legal proceedings to enforce its decisions .
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário